Ask a bank how confident it is in the emissions data behind its SME loan book, and the honest answer is usually “not very.” Most of that data still comes from surveys — chased, half-completed, and quietly out of date within a year.

Renewal season for commercial insurers usually means the same conversation on
repeat: chasing a policyholder for information that either never arrives, or arrives in a
format nobody can compare to last year’s file.

According to the Association of British Insurers, insurers are increasingly expected to
factor climate and sustainability-related resilience into commercial underwriting and
portfolio risk management. Doing that credibly requires data that can actually be
compared — something ad hoc disclosure chasing was never built to deliver.
A structured, consistent framework changes what that conversation looks like.

What a 120-Metric Framework Actually Covers

TDH’S public disclosure analysis works by scoring companies against a consistent set
of 120 questions, built around what actually drives risk and resilience in that company’s
sector.

• Metrics are weighted by industry materiality, so a manufacturer and a hospitality
business aren’t judged against identical criteria

• Coverage spans 11 sectors and 77 industries, giving underwriters a consistent
reference point regardless of what a policyholder does

• Scores roll up into topic-level and pillar-level views, so a single company’s
resilience profile is easy to read at a glance

This isn’t a survey a policyholder fills in once and forgets. It’s built from public
disclosures — websites, reports, certifications, policy documents — structured into a
comparable format from day one.

Why Consistency Across Sectors Matters

A risk indicator only means something if it means the same thing every time it’s used.
Without a shared framework, one underwriter’s read on “good practice” won’t match
another’s, and a company’s score this year won’t compare cleanly to last year’s. That
inconsistency breaks portfolio-level analysis before it starts.

A consistent, sector-weighted scoring approach means every company — regardless of
size, sector or how much they’ve disclosed — gets measured against the same
underlying logic. That’s what makes the resulting data usable for something beyond a
single file.

What This Enables for Portfolio Benchmarking

Once every company in a book of business is scored the same way, underwriters gain
something surveys never provided: a genuine portfolio view.

• Benchmark a single policyholder against sector, industry or revenue-band
averages

• Spot which parts of a portfolio carry outsized resilience or supply chain risk
before renewal, not after a claim

• Track how a company’s risk profile shifts year over year, on a like-for-like basis

The public disclosure analysis supports this by keeping scores current as new
disclosures become available — so benchmarking reflects where a business actually
stands, not a snapshot from a renewal cycle ago.

What This Means for Underwriting Teams

A 120-metric view doesn’t just fill a data gap. It turns renewal conversations from an
information-chasing exercise into a genuine risk discussion, backed by data that holds
up across the whole book.

Talk to Our Team

See how public disclosure analysis brings consistent, sector-weighted risk data into
your renewal and portfolio review process. Talk to our team to explore what it looks like
for your book of business.

Subscribe to our newsletter for insights and updates on all things Sustainability and Resiliency

More articles

Subscription Form

Subscription Form